Five-year near-term targets are now the foundation.
The required core is now two or more near-term targets on a fixed five-year cycle, set separately for each scope at 100% coverage. Long-term targets sit above that and are conditional or optional. A net-zero target is the optional capstone — and setting one triggers specific conditions (below).
Near-term targets are mandatory and do the work. Net-zero is now a choice you add on top.
What conditions apply if you set a net-zero target?
A net-zero target is optional — but choosing it commits you to the full architecture. The SBTi sets conditions both for setting a net-zero target and for reaching the net-zero state.
Comprehensive coverage up front
- Set near-term targets on scope 1, 2 and 3, using eligible methods.
- Set long-term targets on scope 1, 2 and 3 to reach residual levels.
- Long-term targets must cover 100% of scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions.
- Long-term target year is 2050 at the latest (high-income countries recommended earlier).
Deep cuts, then neutralise
- Reduce scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions to zero or a residual level consistent with eligible net-zero pathways.
- Neutralise all residual emissions with carbon removals at the net-zero year — and any emissions released thereafter.
- Net-zero cannot be claimed until both are achieved.
Under V2.0 a company can be fully SBTi-aligned with near-term targets only. A net-zero target is a bigger commitment — it pulls in 100% long-term coverage across all three scopes plus neutralisation. Companies should set one deliberately, not by default.
Source: CNZS V2.0 §3.5 (C17–C17.4)V1 → V2 comparison & references (direct quotes)
| Version 1.3.1 | Version 2.0 |
|---|---|
| “…cover a period of 5 to 10 years from the date of submission.”Transition Guide, p.14 (C17) | “…cover a period of 5 years from the date of submission.”Transition Guide, p.14 (C9) |
| “…set target(s) to cover 95% of scope 1 and 2 emissions.”Transition Guide, p.14 (C5 fn.18) | “…cover 100% of scope 1 emissions, targeted separately from scope 2.”Transition Guide, p.14 (C10) |
Your size and geography decide your obligations.
V2.0 replaces the corporate / SME / financial-institution split with two categories, A and B, set from consolidated size, geography and emissions. The category is fixed at registration for the whole cycle and re-checked when you next set targets. It determines which requirements are mandatory and which are optional.
A €600m-revenue group is Category A on turnover alone — no further tests needed.
A €120m firm in a high-income country with 9,000 tCO₂e scope 1+2 and 300 FTE fails the emissions test but meets two financial tests (turnover ≥ €50m, FTE ≥ 250) → Category A.
A small firm in a lower-income country below the thresholds → Category B, with scope 3 targets and base-year assurance optional.
Methodology detail & references
- Consolidated basis. Thresholds are assessed for the group as a whole, even where the target boundary sits lower — for comparability across large groups.
- Two-year average. Figures are drawn from the two most recent financial statements; non-euro reporters convert to euros.
- Geography. Determined by the ultimate parent's country, classified using World Bank income categories.
- Fossil fuel companies cannot validate targets yet, pending sector methods (limited exceptions apply).
Methods now match how each scope decarbonises.
Each scope gets routes that fit its reality. The charts below summarise the shape of each route; the explainers underneath set out what each method is and how it is calculated. You can combine methods within a scope.
Cut emissions at the source
- Absolute — linear cut
- Intensity (SDA) — sector convergence
- Asset transition — phase-out milestones
Decarbonise purchased energy
- LCE alignment — low-carbon share ↑
- Absolute reduction
- >20% electricity growth → absolute required
Target what's material
- Significant (≥5%) — must be covered
- Below 5% — may be excluded
- Choose from three archetypes (below)
Scope 1 — three routes, explained
Absolute emissions reduction
Emissions intensity — Sectoral Decarbonization Approach (SDA)
Asset transition — Asset Decarbonization Plan (ADP)
A Category A company whose near-term scope 1 target uses the intensity or asset-transition route must also set a long-term scope 1 target — because neither guarantees an absolute path on its own.
Source: CNZS V2.0 C10–C11 · Transition Guide, p.15Scope 2 — two routes, explained
Low-carbon-electricity (LCE) alignment
Absolute emissions reduction
Scope 3 — three archetypes, explained
You first identify significant categories — any category individually at 5% or more of total scope 3 (categories 1–14). Activities with no practical influence, or below the threshold, may be excluded. You then cover the significant ones using one or a combination of three archetypes.
Overarching absolute emissions reduction
Overarching supplier / customer alignment
Category- or activity-specific
A logistics firm sets its scope 1 fleet target by asset transition (planned vehicle phase-out), an LCE-alignment target for its warehouses' electricity, and — finding purchased goods and downstream transport each exceed 5% of total scope 3 — a supplier-alignment target for goods and a transport-alignment target for distribution. Categories under 5% are excluded.
V1 → V2 scope-1 methods (direct quotes) & references
| Version 1.3.1 | Version 2.0 |
|---|---|
| “Absolute Contraction Approach (ACA); Sectoral Decarbonization Approach (SDA) if applicable.”Transition Guide, p.15 (Table 3) | “Asset transition targets with a trajectory defined by an Asset Decarbonization Plan…”Transition Guide, p.15 (C10–C11) |
← Back to overview · Next: Delivery →